Skip to content
Searching…

No results found

Try a different search term

Type at least 2 characters to search

↑↓ Navigate
Open
Esc Close
Parfum 2018 Sweet Masculine

Wardrobe summary

0 catalog entries tracked by the community.

Own

0 users own this

Want

0 users want this

Had

0 users had this

Sampled

0 users sampled this

Performance & Wear

Community performance reports and wear-context votes.

0 performance votes · 0 wear votes

Longevity

Projection

Blind Buy

Compliments

Seasons

No votes yet.

Time of Day

No votes yet.

Occasion

No votes yet.

Batch Tracking

Community-reported batch codes, production dates, and variation notes.

0 tracked batches

No batch entries yet.

Description

A perfume by Charles Wong for men, released in 2018. The scent is sweet-synthetic. It is being marketed by Puig. Compare

Share

Notes

Accords

No accords have been added yet.

Facts

Brand Charles Wong
Release year 2018
Concentration Parfum
Family Sweet

Collections

Not in any public collections yet.

Similar fragrances

Community-sourced alternatives with the strongest agreement.

0 suggestions

No similar fragrances

Nothing here yet. Be the first to suggest a community similarity link for this fragrance.

Reviews

Most helpful promoted first.

5 total
ZombZ 5.0 Jun 13, 2026

Incredible

0 found helpful

I had this fragrance as a sample with another purchase and initially thought nothing of it, but after just a brief test, I was immediately surprised by how wonderful the scent was. I was completely taken by this DNA and had to keep smelling it again and again in the following days. After a short consideration, I decided to buy it because I was simply addicted to it. It does smell quite synthetic, but not unpleasant and interesting at all. Otherwise, I unfortunately can't categorize the scent well, which adds to the factor of mystery for me.

LeoBbgrl Jun 13, 2026

score 6/10

0 found helpful

It's like a mixture between Pegasus (Parfums De Marly) and 1 Million (Paco Rabanne), imagine a young man in his early 20's liking and wearing 1 million, when he grows up and becomes more mature in his 30's he likes and wears this one. I would personally find it likable on a man, but not love it. Not very memorable. Easy to forget

SipriaN 4.0 Jun 13, 2026

SACNDAL INTENSE

0 found helpful

Scandal Intense has an aromatic woody sweet opening with a touch of Leather, but it's very subtle. I also got a few whiffs of Tonka Bean and Cardamom in the opening The longevity is very good, it lasts approximately 12 hours on my skin. This fragrance projects great with about a 6 ft radius for the first hour, and a skin scent after. (Depends on skin types ) Overall Rating (8,5/10) In my honest opinion, it's a redundant release if you already own the previous Scandal flankers. It's not really a leather fragrance, but more of a "fresher/aromatic" version of the original Scandal.

Herrenkaste 3.5 Jun 13, 2026

The first scandal for adult men

0 found helpful

The scent starts off zesty and pleasantly sweet, reminiscent of its brothers (with the big difference that thankfully nothing is sticky here). However, the youthful burst of freshness fades after just a few minutes, and more maturity takes the reins. As it develops further, for me, nothing but dry wood takes the lead, although I also believe I can detect some nutmeg as well as a decent portion of tonka (similar to Code edp). Leather is announced, but it is hardly discernible or can only be constructed with imagination: in fact, earthy, subtly animalistic accords join in, which could remind one of leather. This one has very little in common with its predecessors, which may be a relief for some. Note: definitely test the scent on skin - the test strip delivers drastically more synthetic notes and sweetness than my skin. Updated on 05/25/2025

StinkSultan 2.0 Jun 13, 2026

Another One Bites the Dust

0 found helpful

All of the entries from the Scandal pour Homme line have disappointed me so far. The original Scandal pour Homme lacked smoothness and was simply a mishmash of synthetic sweetness, Scandal pour Homme Le Parfum toned down that synthetic edge a bit, but still failed to impress me in terms of scent, and Scandal pour Homme Absolu left me down due to its disappointing performance and short-lived delicious opening. Simply put, none of them are worthy of wearing the crown and occupying the throne. But now we've got another contestant, Scandal pour Homme Intense, which can either save the Scandal line for me (nothing left to save, really), or it can join its cousins in the pit of shame... Immediately upon spraying, the OG DNA comes upfront - synthetic sweetness. The clary sage brings that sweet, herbaceous, floral, and musky mishmash, which isn't necessarily bad on its own, just lacks balance. The synthetic undertone which is the signature accord of the line and on which all of the notes are built upon just kills it for me. Also, I do get some slight hints of some creamy tonka bean in the opening, which appears to be more and more prominent as things dry down. As minutes pass by, the synthetic aura takes a slight step back, making way for even more prominent tonka bean sweetness, while the vetiver mildly shows up. It adds a dry and woody aroma to the composition, but it's hardly earthy, which is one of the key accords of vetiver, meaning that there's not much vetiver in here, really. Frankly, you really got to dig through the scent to just get the slightest of that unmistakable vetiver aroma, which here is quite cheap and as "safe" and bland as it gets. But you know what else you don't get a lot of in here? Leather. When I initially saw Scandal pour Homme Intense added in leather, I admit, my expectations rose a nudge. I adore leather, and I hoped that this would finally be the ingredient that might save whatever's left of the Scandal pour Homme line for me. But boy, was I wrong. The leather here is some of the faintest, most subtle, softest, mildest, barest leather that I've smelt in a fragrance. There might be something which reminds of leather, but hardly so, and it appears like 10-15 minutes after spraying. Let me be clear, though: there's little development here. The syntheticness dissipating a bit since the start gives you the feeling that there's development underway, but really, everything smells very similar from start to finish. There's no story being told, nor much quality at the door. On a more positive note, longevity here is excellent, at least on my skin. I get a minimum of 12 hours, with some cases reaching even 15 hours, which makes it the Scandal with the best longevity on my skin. Of course, by those marks, all I sense is a very faint, warm leather woodiness, which frankly, I much prefer over the loud synthetic-sweet opening. As for projection, I got about 2 feet for the first hour, settling down to about a 1 foot bubble for the next few hours, and reaching a skin scent somewhere around the 5 hour mark. Not bad at all. With occasions, Scandal pour Homme Intense pretty much falls in the same bowl as most of its cousins - partying and clubbing. It can definitely work as a daily too, or even for evening dates. But honestly, I would never recommend this or any of the other fragrances from the Scandal line to someone over 25 years old. Even though Scandal pour Homme Intense will be seen as the more "mature" Scandal purely because of that misleading leather in the notes pyramid, it's still very clearly aimed towards the younger demographic. The whole line has that youthful edge, mainly because of that synthetic sweet combo and that weird "bad boy" vibe I get from the Scandal line as a whole. So, it's another unfortunate candidate. The scent resembles the Le Parfum flanker quite closely, which is definitely not something I missed, and the leather is not really there, which adds to my disappointment furthermore. However, I'm more disappointed in myself for having any sort of expectations from this. The only pros here, in my opinion, are the performance and the marketing. This (and the whole Scandal lineup) is clearly dedicated and marketed towards the youth, teenagers, Gen Z, etc. So in the end, if the fragrance finds its right fanbase (and it will, since anyone more invested in perfumery and niche will stay away from this), then it will also find plenty of success. That's pretty much all most companies care for these days. Nonetheless, I think Scandal pour Homme Intense concludes it for me - the Scandal line is not for me. It never was and it will never be. Overall Rating: 6.5/10 Updated on 09/05/2025

More from Charles Wong

Related fragrances.

Brand page

Recommend this fragrance

Send "Aurora" to another user via DM.

Report incorrect data

Help us keep the database accurate. Select a category and describe the issue.